<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3D or not 3D? That is the question&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.eyefulpresentations.co.uk/2012/10/05/3d-or-not-3d-that-is-the-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.eyefulpresentations.co.uk/2012/10/05/3d-or-not-3d-that-is-the-question/</link>
	<description>All things PowerPoint and presentation based...and a few stories from around the office</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:16:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Monteiro</title>
		<link>http://blog.eyefulpresentations.co.uk/2012/10/05/3d-or-not-3d-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-123678</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Monteiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 18:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyefulpresentations.co.uk/?p=3110#comment-123678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started testing anamorphic 3D, decades ago for presentations with 35mm slides... 
It didn&#039;t went further because it resulted in nothing more than a very interesting and stylish artistic visual experience, with no value added to presentations. 

More than 20 years after, just for curiosity, I already tested it, for PowerPoint slide decks and my opinion hasn&#039;t changed... 

3D cinema is still a dubious thing... Cinema is meant to be entertainment - how can you enjoy something that - not being perfect yet - gives you headaches? 

More than that, with an &quot;army&quot; around presentations still reducing Design to a visual function, while still complaining about animations, you can guess what wouldn&#039;t they say when you&#039;ll force them to use goggles and give them headaches for the sake of a 3D presentation... 

But, for me, nothing would be more unbearable than being forced to give them reason...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started testing anamorphic 3D, decades ago for presentations with 35mm slides&#8230;<br />
It didn&#8217;t went further because it resulted in nothing more than a very interesting and stylish artistic visual experience, with no value added to presentations. </p>
<p>More than 20 years after, just for curiosity, I already tested it, for PowerPoint slide decks and my opinion hasn&#8217;t changed&#8230; </p>
<p>3D cinema is still a dubious thing&#8230; Cinema is meant to be entertainment &#8211; how can you enjoy something that &#8211; not being perfect yet &#8211; gives you headaches? </p>
<p>More than that, with an &#8220;army&#8221; around presentations still reducing Design to a visual function, while still complaining about animations, you can guess what wouldn&#8217;t they say when you&#8217;ll force them to use goggles and give them headaches for the sake of a 3D presentation&#8230; </p>
<p>But, for me, nothing would be more unbearable than being forced to give them reason&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
